UPDATE: Ich link einfach mal zum zusammenfassenden Post


Vllt. hat jemand mitgekriegt dass Leeke eine neue Doll rausgebracht hat - dumm nur dass diese aussieht wie eine Dust of Dolls Püns und Leeke auch noch beim LDoll-Festival sehr interessiert an betreffender Doll war...
Ich lasse DoD für sich selbst sprechen und präsentiere die definitiv harten - bildlichen - Fakten.
Leeke hat die Bilder mittlerweile editiert.





Tragisch dass es nicht das erste Mal ist das Leeke Copyrights verletzt - Das Original und was Leeke daraus machte.

Bis jetzt ist noch kein Ergebnis in Sicht ich finde allerdings dass die Beweise erdrückend sind.

Kleines Update.
So wies aussieht beschuldigt Leeke DoD jetzt die Unoa Legs kopiert zu haben (WTF!?)
Ich für meinen Teil werde auf alle Fälle Leeke definitiv boykottieren denn das ist unter der Gürtellinie.

DoA darf sich nicht offiziell dazu äußern (oder die betreffende Doll bannen) weil Leeke ja rein theoretisch ein Gerichtsverfahren gegen sie anstrengen könne und das wäre das Ende von DoA.
Hat zumindest Armeleia im Leeke M-Doll Discussion Thread in der Mini-Sektion erwähnt.

Könnte interessant sein - aus Armeleias Blog:

Zitat

---

I posted a response to a forum member this morning and I’m sure it will be reposted… So I am posting it here in it’s entirity so pieces can’t be reposted out of context. Out of respect for the member, I’m not including her post. To summarize, she expressed her anger that DoA wasn’t banning Leeke Mikhaila and demanded we put the doll to member vote.

As we have said, DoA is not a court of law and we cannot get involved in anything other than straight-forward cases of recasting. Please understand that companies copy each other nigh constantly, and were we to ban everything that resembled something else, there would be no dolls left on DoA. We cannot just pick and choose cases to champion; while we are all pretty much uniformly fans of Dust of Dolls, we can’t side with them just because they are a small atelier against a major company. Should we then go back and retroactively ban the Dollzone 70cm body, which was accused very firmly of being a recast, then an EXTREMELY inspired-by copy? In Dollzone’s case, we know from their own workbench comparison photos that they physically had an SD16 body in their possession and most likely sculpted directly from it. Should we retroactively ban B&G Nailo, which was suspected of being a copy of LUTS Yder? Should we ban the Everpurple body because of its resemblence to Unoss and Unon? Should we ban Impldoll Ciel because they copied the concept and design of LUTS Abaddon of the Judgement, albeit on a smaller scale? Should we ban Angell-Studio, who went so far to copy Soom Io that they actually mimicked their promo photos and ad copy? Should we go back and ban the original Soom Gem body, which was almost a clone of LUTS Delf? These are only a handful of examples from across our ever-changing hobby. (I am offering them as simple examples, rather than because I have any strong emotion about them or interest in debating those specific dolls with you.)

I’m sure you will disagree, but banning Leeke Mikhaila on Dust of Dolls’ say-so opens up the floodgates for any company to accuse their competitors of copying with the expectation that the doll will be banned. DoA simply cannot get involved in cases of intellectual property; as we said, we can only ban direct recasts.

We will never open DoA’s policy up to member vote. The community whips itself into a two-week long emotional fervor several times every year and were we to allow that to dictate how the forum is administrated, we’d have either burned ourself to a cinder or been forced to close due to litigation. DoA’s moderation team looks out for the community in the long term; we cannot be emotional. As I said in the Mikhaila thread, people take for granted that “DoA will always be there,” but all it would take would be one lawsuit to end things. It is unfair to a community of over 10,000 members to risk DoA’s existence over an issue that does not actually concern them; truly, this is between Dust of Dolls and Leeke.

We are giving members the opportunity to give their opinions via their signatures and posts in debate and discussion. We are allowing members to “vote” with their money by choosing to buy or boycott. The issue isn’t as one-sided as you think… we have received an equal number of Pro-Leeke and Pro-Dust of Dolls PMs and questions.

I feel we have been rather transparent on the issue aside from giving our individual opinions on the situation. They are immaterial, as our blanket policy is that we only ban recasts… You will not find any official support or condemnation for either side.

I am happy to answer your questions, but please be aware that it is in no way negotiation. I am speaking on behalf of all of our Admins and we are firm in our position.

---